I. Application for AMTA Approval:
The American Music Therapy Association will
provide upon request materials for AMTA approval of baccalaureate
and equivalency programs in music therapy and/or for AMTA
approval of graduate programs in music therapy, including AMTA Standards
for Education and Clinical Training, Professional Competencies, application
forms and related information.
American Music Therapy Association, Inc.
8455 Colesville Road, Suite 1000
Silver Spring, MD 20910-3392
Telephone: (301) 589-3300
Facsimile: (301) 589-5175
Only academic institutions accredited or
affirmed by the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM)
are eligible to apply for AMTA approval. NASM accredits
institutions, while AMTA approves programs. (Refer to Glossary in
the AMTA Standards for Education and Clinical Training for
explanations of "Accreditation,"
"Affirmation," and "Approval.")
An institution may apply for AMTA approval
concurrently with application for NASM accreditation/affirmation
review. Schools should contact NASM in regard to NASM
accreditation/affirmation standards and procedures and AMTA in
regard to AMTA approval standards and procedures. For
institutions with NASM accreditation, the institution may apply
for AMTA approval concurrently with application for NASM Plan
Approval. (Refer to NASM Handbook for procedures required
for instituting new curricula). If an institution does not have
NASM accreditation or affirmation, the institution should contact
NASM to determine if it is eligible to apply for NASM accreditation or
affirmation. For institutions seeking NASM affirmation, an
institution must have a letter of authorization from AMTA
indicating that it meets one or more of the eligibility criteria
for the NASM Alternative Review Process. (For additional
information, refer to Section II, "Institutions Seeking AMTA
Approval for New Programs" in this document). The
institution then notifies the respective associations involved of
its intent to apply for NASM accreditation/affirmation and/or
AMTA approval.
Final approval by AMTA will not be granted
until the academic institution has NASM accreditation or
affirmation. It is the responsibility of the academic institution
to verify with AMTA when it has obtained the NASM accreditation
or affirmation. For institutions that (1) have completed the AMTA
review process and (2) are in the process of seeking NASM
accreditation or affirmation, AMTA may grant conditional approval
pending NASM accreditation or affirmation. Conditional approval
by AMTA will allow the institution to appoint music therapy
faculty, recruit students, and offer music therapy courses for a
limited time period.
During this period, the institution will notify
students that applications to NASM and AMTA are pending.
Institutions that already offer music degree programs should seek
NASM accreditation or affirmation concurrently with the
application for AMTA approval, with a time limit of one year from
the date of the AMTA application for scheduling the NASM review
and two years from the date of the AMTA application for
completing the on-site portion of the NASM review. Institutions
that do not currently offer music degree programs may seek AMTA
conditional approval before applying for NASM accreditation or
affirmation, with a time limit for scheduling the NASM review not
to exceed two years beyond the date of the AMTA conditional
approval and the time for completing the on-site review portion
of the NASM review not to exceed three years beyond the date of
the AMTA conditional approval. The specific deadlines for
scheduling and completing the on-site portion of the NASM review
will be determined mutually by AMTA and NASM within these time
frames. In all cases, the AMTA conditional approval will not
exceed four years.
Applications for AMTA approval will be
submitted to AMTA for review by the Academic Program Approval
Committee. This Committee may make a recommendation to (1)
approve the program; (2) defer approval until necessary changes
are documented; (3) grant conditional approval pending NASM
accreditation or affirmation for a limited period of time; or (4)
not approve. The Committees recommendation will be
submitted to the Executive Board for official action. The
Executive Director will then notify the academic institution in
writing of the status of its application, with an explanation of
the Board of Directors decision (if applicable).
II. Institutions Seeking AMTA
Approval for New Programs:
Only academic institutions accredited or
affirmed by the National Association of Schools of Music (NASM)
are eligible to apply for AMTA approval. An institution may apply
for AMTA approval concurrently with application for NASM
accreditation or affirmation review.
Steps in Applying for AMTA Approval:
Step 1. The American Music Therapy Association
(AMTA) will provide upon request application materials and
related information, including the AMTA Standards for
Education and Clinical Training, Professional Competencies,
Standards of Clinical Practice and Code of Ethics.
Step 2. If the academic institution is already
accredited by NASM, please advise AMTA of this status. If the
institution is not accredited by NASM, contact NASM to determine
if the institution is eligible for NASM accreditation or
affirmation, and to request the NASM Handbook and
application materials. If the academic institution is not
eligible for NASM accreditation, it should also request the
document, "Procedures: Alternative Review Process for Music
Therapy Programs" which is applicable to programs seeking
NASM affirmation. If the academic institution meets the AMTA
eligibility criteria for NASM affirmation, the institution must
request an official letter from AMTA indicating that it meets the
eligibility criteria.
Step 3. Refer to the "Application for AMTA
Approval of New Baccalaureate and Equivalency Programs in Music
Therapy" or the "Application for AMTA Approval of New
Graduate Programs in Music Therapy" (whichever is
applicable) for completing the application to AMTA.
Step 4. Refer to the AMTA Standards for
Education and Clinical Training (including the
"Preamble") and the Professional Competencies in
designing the curricular structure, which includes the areas of
Music Foundations, Clinical Foundations, Music Therapy, and
General Education. Develop the program(s) according to the
entry-level competencies for baccalaureate and equivalency
programs and/or the masters degree standards for graduate
programs (whichever is applicable); that is, design the program
based on the learning outcomes, or the various areas of
knowledge, skills, and abilities that graduates will acquire as a
result of the program.
Step 5. Determine in what specific courses and
clinical training experiences each of the specific entry-level
competencies or masters degree standards are being targeted
(whichever is applicable). Integrate the students academic
and clinical learning experiences according to developmental
sequences.
Step 6 . Survey clinical resources in the
community and/or the nearby geographic area to develop a list of
sites to be used for pre-internship clinical training
experiences. Design the requirements and supervision of
pre-internship placements. (Applicable to graduate programs
offering the equivalency). Also compile a list of names and
credentials and/or professional designations of on-site
supervisors.
Step 7. Design the clinical training program to
meet the AMTA standards, which include plans for both the
pre-internship and internship clinical training experiences.
Determine if the academic institution will approve its own
internship sites and/or whether it plans to use sites on the AMTA
National Internship Roster. Design a plan for selecting
internship placements for students and the respective roles and
responsibilities of the student, the internship supervisor(s),
and the academic faculty advisor. (Applicable to graduate
programs offering the equivalency).
Step 8. Outline procedures for developing an
individualized training plan with each student for completion of
all facets of clinical training.
Step 9. Outline procedures for developing
internship agreements made between the student, internship
supervisor, and academic faculty as outlined in the AMTA
standards.
Step 10. Develop a system for evaluating
student competence at various stages of the program. (Note: A
sample form for "Evaluation of Student Competencies" is
available from AMTA). For graduate programs evaluate the AMTA
masters level standards and/or standard for doctoral
degrees.
Step 11. Develop a competency-based system for
evaluation of the program and its graduates by faculty,
supervisors, and/or students.
Step 12. Determine if the academic faculty and
clinical supervisors meet the AMTA Standards for qualifications
and staffing.
Step 13. Complete the application form(s) for
AMTA Approval of New Baccalaureate/Equivalency Programs in Music
Therapy and/or the AMTA Approval of New Graduate Programs in
Music Therapy, and submit five (5) copies of all application
materials to AMTA. If the academic program is not located in the
United States, a total of six (6) copies of the application
materials must be submitted to AMTA. All materials submitted must
be in English.
III. Reapplying for AMTA Approval According
to the AMTA Standards for Education and Clinical
Training (2000):
All academic institutions previously approved
by AAMT and NAMT shall maintain their approval status with AMTA
during the transition from previous standards to the standards
adopted in 2000, which were effective March 1, 2001. The
transition period has been designated as five years (March 1,
2001 - March 1, 2006). For academic institutions previously
approved by AAMT and NAMT that are not scheduled to reapply for
AMTA approval during the designated time period for the
transition, such institutions shall maintain their approval
status with AMTA until their next scheduled review.
1. AMTA-Approved Programs in NASM
Institutions:
AMTA shall review approved academic
institutions according to the AMTA Standards for Education and
Clinical Training (2000) at the time of their next scheduled
review by NASM. If the review is scheduled during the first three
years of the transition period from previous association
standards to the standards adopted in 2000, an academic
institution may request deferral of the AMTA review for a maximum
of two years. Inasmuch as the policies and procedures for
reapplying for AMTA approval according to the AMTA Standards
for Education and Clinical Training (2000) were adopted one
year after the beginning of the designated transition period this
time period for deferrals will be extended by one year, beginning
with the 2002-2003 academic year. (Refer to Step 1.a.2 below).
1. a. Procedures for Reapplying According to
the AMTA Standards for Education and Clinical Training (2000):
Step 1.a.1 Determine when the institution is
scheduled for its next review by NASM. This is defined as the
year in which the site visit by NASM is scheduled.
Step 1.a.2 If the review is scheduled during
the years of 2002-2003, 2003-2004, or 2004-2005, the institution
may request a deferral of the AMTA review for a maximum of two
years after the scheduled NASM review.
Step 1.a.3 Notify AMTA in writing of the year
in which the institution is requesting the AMTA review to
coincide with the NASM review or request a deferral as specified
in Step 1.a.2 above. Indicate if the review is for a
baccalaureate/equivalency program and/or a masters degree
program in music therapy.
Step 1.a.4 AMTA will send the institution the
application information for AMTA review of
baccalaureate/equivalency programs and/or masters degree
programs.
Step 1.a.5 The institution should prepare its
application for reapplying for AMTA approval review during the
same academic year as the NASM site visit.
Step 1.a.6 Prepare the application materials
for AMTA review of baccalaureate/equivalency programs and/or
masters degree programs as outlined below in Sections 3 and
4. Note that this will include copies of the NASM Self-Study
documentation related to undergraduate and/or graduate programs
in music therapy, as well as additional information requested by
AMTA, which is related to the AMTA Standards for Education and
Clinical Training (2000).
Step 1.a.7 The application should be submitted
to AMTA no later than June 1st of the academic year of
the AMTA and NASM reviews.
Step 1.a.8 If there are any questions or
additional information needed for the AMTA review, the Academic
Program Approval Committee will contact the institution no later
than September 1st of the year in which the
application is submitted for review. The institution should
respond to such a request within 30 days.
Step 1.a.9 Following the review of the
application by AMTA, if there are any questions, recommended
changes, or additional information needed, the institution will
be notified and must respond in a timely manner as requested by
AMTA.
Step 1.a.10 Following the NASM review, the
institution must notify AMTA in writing of the status of its NASM
accreditation review. If NASM action has been deferred for any
reason, it is the responsibility of the institution to notify
AMTA annually in writing of the status of the institutions
accreditation. If NASM accreditation is suspended, the
institution must notify AMTA immediately in writing, since the
institutions AMTA-approved academic program will no longer
be in compliance with AMTA Standards.
1.b Steps in Subsequent Periodic Reviews by
AMTA:
AMTA shall consider academic institutions for
approval review every ten years after the initial application and
review in conjunction with the NASM accreditation review. The
steps outlined above should be followed for subsequent periodic
reviews by AMTA.
2. AMTA-Approved Programs in Institutions
Not Affiliated with NASM:
AMTA-approved academic programs in institutions
that do not offer degrees or majors in music and that did not
hold NASM accreditation or affirmation at the time the AMTA Standards
for Education and Clinical Training (2000) were
adopted are eligible to reapply for AMTA approval according to
these standards without seeking NASM accreditation or
affirmation. AMTA-approved academic programs in institutions that
do offer degrees or majors in music but do not currently hold
NASM accreditation or affirmation must apply for NASM
accreditation or affirmation in order to maintain AMTA approval.
2. a. Procedures for Reapplying According to
the AMTA Standards for Education and Clinical Training (2000):
Step 2.a.1 AMTA will determine a schedule for
review of the academic institution and will notify the
institution at least two years prior to the review. AMTA will
send the institution the application information for AMTA review
of baccalaureate/equivalency programs and/or masters
programs.
Step 2.a.2 Institutions that offer degrees or
majors in music but do not currently hold NASM accreditation or
affirmation must contact NASM to schedule a review for either
accreditation or affirmation in the year in which the AMTA review
is scheduled. Institutions seeking NASM affirmation should
request the NASM Handbook and the NASM document,
"Procedures: Alternate Review Process for Music Therapy
Programs." Note: To initiate the NASM Alternative Review
Process, an institution must have a letter of authorization from
AMTA indicating that it meets one or more of the criteria for
eligibility for the Alternative Review Process by NASM. (A copy
of the "AMTA Eligibility Criteria for Institutional Use of
the NASM Alternative Review Process" can be obtained from
AMTA).
Step 2.a.3 The institution should prepare its
application for reapplying for AMTA approval review during the
academic year scheduled by AMTA.
Step 2.a.4 Prepare the application materials
for AMTA review of approved baccalaureate/equivalency programs
and/or masters degree programs as outlined below in Section
3, "Preparing the Application for AMTA-Approved Programs
Reapplying for AMTA Approval." Note that for academic
programs in institutions that offer degrees or majors in music,
this will include copies of the NASM Self-Study documentation
related to undergraduate and/or masters degree programs in
music therapy as specified in Section 4. For academic
institutions that do not offer degrees or majors in music and are
not required to seek NASM accreditation or affirmation, refer to
the NASM Handbook for the following information: general
standards for baccalaureate and graduate programs in music, as
well as competencies, standards, guidelines, and/or requirements
for specific baccalaureate and or masters degree programs
in music therapy; and provide the documentation to AMTA which is
required in Section 4.
Step 2.a.5 The application should be submitted
to AMTA no later than June 1st of the academic year
scheduled by AMTA.
Step 2.a.6 Upon receipt of the application by all Academic
Program Approval Committee subcommittee members, the Academic Program Approval
Committee will acknowledge receipt of the application materials. If the
Academic Program Approval Committee requires additional clarification for its
review, the Academic Program Approval Committee will contact the institution
within 60 days of receipt. The institution should respond to such as
request within 45 days of receipt.
Step 2.a.7 Following the review of the
application by AMTA, if there are any questions, recommended
changes, or additional information needed, the institution will
be notified and must respond in a timely manner as requested by
AMTA.
Step 2.a.8 Following the NASM review for
affirmation or accreditation (if applicable), the institution
must notify AMTA in writing of the status of its NASM review. For
institutions required to have the NASM review, if NASM action has
been deferred for any reason, it is the responsibility of the
institution to notify AMTA annually in writing of the status of
the institutions accreditation or affirmation. In such
cases, AMTA will determine a time limit for the institution to
meet the NASM standards for accreditation or affirmation in order
to receive AMTA approval of its music therapy program(s). If the
designated time limit is not reached, the institutions
academic program(s) in music therapy will not be in compliance
with AMTA standards.
2. b. Steps in Subsequent Periodic Reviews
by AMTA:
AMTA shall consider academic institutions for
approval every ten years after the initial application and review
by AMTA. The steps outlined above should be followed for
subsequent periodic reviews by AMTA.
Preparing the Application for AMTA-Approved
Programs Reapplying for AMTA Approval:
Step 3.1 Refer to "Procedures for
Reapplying According to the AMTA Standards" in Section 1.a.
or 2.a. above (whichever is applicable), and the application
materials for reapplying for AMTA approval.
Step 3.2 Gather and refer to all of the
following AMTA documents: Standards for Education and Clinical
Training (2000) (including the "Preamble" and
"Policies and Procedures for Academic Program
Approval"), Professional Competencies, Standards of
Clinical Practice, Code of Ethics, and the NASM Handbook.
Step 3.3 Make copies of the information
requested in Section 4.a below. For institutions that do not
offer degrees or majors in music and that do not currently hold
NASM accreditation or affirmation, prepare a report for AMTA that
includes all of the information requested in Section 4.a below.
Step 3.4 Prepare a report for AMTA outlining
information related to the AMTA Standards for Education
and Clinical Training (2000) as outlined in Section 4.b
below.
Step 3.5 Prepare a cover page as directed in
Section 4 and submit five (5) copies of all application materials
to AMTA. If the academic program is not located in the United
States, a total of six (6) copies of the application materials
must be submitted to AMTA in English.
Application Materials Requested for AMTA
Review of Music Therapy Programs Reapplying for AMTA Approval
According to the AMTA Standards:
Prepare a cover page for the application
materials, which includes the name and address of the
institution; date application is submitted; status of NASM
accreditation or affirmation; names of music therapy program
director and head of academic unit for the music therapy program.
(Please note that AMTA must be informed immediately of any
changes in the NASM status).
4.a. Submit Copies of Information
Reported in the NASM Self-Study Document for Accreditation or
Affirmation Reviews re: Instructional Programs in Music Therapy
for Each Degree Program Being Reviewed by AMTA:
Please note that NASM reviews the procedures
for the NASM Self-Study Document every five years for possible
revisions, which includes the following items 4.a.1 through
4.a.8. If there are revisions by NASM to these items, AMTA will
recognize any revised and current versions of this information in
its review).
4.a.1 Provide a Curricular Table which includes
Degree Title; Number of Years to Complete the Degree; Number of
Credits and Percentage of Credits in the Major Area,
Supportive/Other Courses in Music Studies, General Studies, and
Electives; Total Number of Credits; Current Semesters
Enrollment in Majors; and Names of Program Supervisors. List
course numbers, titles, and credit allotments under each
applicable category (Major Area, etc).
4.a.2 Program or degree title, with emphasis if
applicable, followed by a statement of goals and objectives (for
example, for whom the program or degree is intended, its
preparational emphasis, etc).
4.a.3 An assessment of compliance with the NASM
standards for the degree. (Refer to the NASM Handbook, all
applicable instructional standards outlined under "Standards
for Baccalaureate and Graduate Degree-Granting Institutions and
Programs," and appropriate Handbook appendices. Note:
Special attention should be given to common standards and goals
for all baccalaureate and/or masters degree programs as
well as requirements for the specific baccalaureate and
masters degree programs in music therapy). This assessment must address
the competencies required by the Standards in terms of specific content,
expectations for knowledge and skills development, and levels of achievement
required for graduation. If the program
involves distance learning, analyze it in light of NASM
standards in this area. (Refer to the Operational Standards
section (item II.) of the NASM Handbook). If the
program is designed as a multi- or interdisciplinary combination,
describe the music therapy program or degree in relation to the
other disciplines. For academic institutions that do not offer
degrees or majors in music and are not seeking NASM accreditation
or affirmation, discuss admission policies regarding standards
for musicianship and other entrance requirements for students
entering the program; and how deficiencies in musicianship would
be remedied.
4.a.4 Institutions offering graduate degrees
must include a discussion of the following: (Note: This section
is not applicable to doctoral degrees at this time, since AMTA
does not yet have policies and procedures for approval of
doctoral degrees).
(This section is applicable only to
masters degree programs. If not applicable, skip to item
4.a.5).
(1) Proficiencies required for entrance to the
program (for example, keyboard, diction, aural skills,
theoretical skills, etc.); when these must be achieved and how
they are tested; whether credit toward the degree is permitted
for study directed toward completion of these proficiencies.
(2) Research and professional tools required in
the program (for example languages, statistics, computer science,
etc.); when these must be achieved and how they are tested;
whether credit toward the degree is permitted for study directed
toward completion of these proficiencies.
(3) The institutions policy for
conducting a comprehensive review at or near the conclusion of
degree study of masters degree candidates.
(4) Candidacy and final project requirements
for the program (for example theses, recitals, research projects,
etc.). Discuss the purpose of these requirements and how they
serve the objectives of the program.
4.a.5 Results of the program related to its
goals and objectives, means for evaluating these results and
assuring that requisite student competencies are being developed,
and means for using these evaluations as the basis for program
improvement.
4.a.6 An assessment of strengths and areas for
improvement, including an assessment of the extent to which the
program is meeting institution-wide or music unit aspirations for
excellence.
4.a.7 A rationale for continuation of the
program if it has had no graduates during the past five years.
4.a.8 Plans for addressing weaknesses and
improving results.
4.b. Additional Information Requested by
AMTA which Relates Specifically to the AMTA Standards
for Education and Clinical Training (2000) (Please
note that the information submitted in this section 4.b must
follow the outline and be designated with the appropriate numbers
and letters for each item):
4.b.1 For baccalaureate/equivalency programs,
refer to the AMTA Professional Competencies and list in
which courses and clinical training experiences each of the areas
for entry-level competencies (e.g. #1, #2, #3, etc.) are being
addressed.
4.b.2 For masters degree programs in
music therapy, refer to the "Standards for Masters
Degrees" in the AMTA Standards for Education and Clinical
Training (2000) and describe how the
masters degree imparts further breadth and depth to
entry-level competency areas while also imparting basic
competence in advanced topics. If an "equivalency"
program in music therapy is combined with a masters degree,
describe the requirements for the equivalency work in order for
the student to demonstrate the entry-level competencies in
musical foundations, clinical foundations, and music therapy.
4.b.3 Describe the design of your
clinical training program, including a list of field agencies used for clinical
training, including both pre-internship and internship placement (unless the
site is on the AMTA National Internship Roster); and provide the names and
professional designations or credentials for clinical training supervisors (with
the exception of the sites on the AMTA National Internship Roster). Please
refer to the AMTA Standards for Education and Clinical Training,
"Standards for Bachelor's Degrees," section on "Clinical Training Component,"
items #2 and #7.
4.b.4 List the names, degrees, and professional
designations/credentials of all music therapy faculty and
indicate if they are full-time or part-time. (Note that academic
institutions shall have one full-time faculty position in music
therapy for each degree program offered).
4.b.5 List all individuals who teach music
therapy courses in your program, and under each name, list the
courses that each teaches per term, the number of credits for
each course, and the usual or average student enrollment in each
course:
Faculty Member Courses Taught # credits
(Sem./Qt.) # Students
4.b.6 Include course descriptions for all music
therapy courses (may be copied from the institutions
bulletin), submit copies of all current music therapy course syllabi, and submit
course sequence/time-lines for all degree programs being reviewed.
4.b.7 Provide a curriculum vitae for each
faculty member teaching a music therapy course. If the faculty
member does not have a graduate degree in music therapy, please
indicate if that faculty member has a minimum of 12 semester
hours or the equivalent of graduate credits in music therapy
beyond the undergraduate degree or equivalency requirements; or
indicate if the faculty member was hired as faculty in an
Association-approved program prior to the year 2000.
4.b.8 (Optional) Comments may be added to provide additional
information or clarification for the reviewers' consideration.
IV. AMTA Review Processes for Approval of
Academic Programs:
Step 1. Academic institution sends five (5)
copies of application materials for AMTA approval review to AMTA.
If the academic program is not located in the United States, a
total of six (6) copies of the application materials must be
submitted to AMTA. If an institution is applying for new program
approval, the application may be submitted at any time.
Step 2. AMTA Director of Professional Programs
maintains one copy of application materials in AMTA office and
distributes the other copies as follows: one copy to Chair of
Academic Program Approval Committee; one copy each to three
members of a Subcommittee appointed by the Chair of the
Committee, to include the regional representative on the
Committee in the region from which the institution is located
when the application is for new program approval. If the
application is from a program not located in the United States,
an additional copy of the application materials will be
distributed to a member of the International Relations Committee
to be designated by the Committee Chair. This representative will
serve as a member of the Subcommittee for Academic Program
Approval for the review of this application only.
Step 3 Subcommittee members and the Committee
Chair review the application materials to determine if additional
information is needed. If so, the academic institution will be
notified in writing regarding information being requested. If an
institution is applying for new program approval, the institution
will be notified in writing no later than 60 days after the
application is received by all members of the Academic Program Approval
Committee subcommittees if additional clarification is
being requested by the Committee.
Step 4. Subcommittee members and the Committee
Chair review the application materials to determine if the
academic program meets the AMTA Standards.
Step 5. Subcommittee members submit a written
report on the review of the application to the Committee Chair,
with a recommendation to (1) approve the program; (2) defer
approval until necessary changes are documented by the
institution; (3) grant conditional approval pending NASM
accreditation or affirmation for a limited period of time; or (4)
not approve. The Committee Chair compiles a report on the reviews
by the Subcommittee members and the Chair.
Step 6. The institution notifies AMTA in
writing of the status of its NASM accreditation /affirmation
review (if applicable) as soon as it receives such notification
from NASM. The Committee Chair will add this information to the
report on the AMTA approval review.
Step 7. If the recommendations by the Committee
Chair and the Subcommittee members are unanimous for
AMTA approval, the Committee Chair will forward a summary of the
report for a recommendation for approval to the AMTA Board of
Directors for official action. If the recommendations are not
unanimous for AMTA approval, the application will be considered
by the entire Academic Program Approval Committee at the next
annual meeting of AMTA. The Committee will make a recommendation
to (1) approve the program; (2) defer approval until necessary
changes are documented by the institution; (3) grant conditional
approval pending NASM accreditation or affirmation for a limited
period of time; or (4) not approve. The Chair will then forward
the Committees recommendation to the AMTA Board of Directors.
Step 8. If the Academic Program Approval
Committee recommends a deferral of approval until necessary
changes are documented by the institution, the institution will
be notified in writing regarding the necessary changes to be
made, with a timetable for such changes to be determined by the
Committee. The institution then sends five (5) copies of the
documented changes to AMTA. If the academic program is not
located in the United States, a total of six (6) copies of the
documented changes must be submitted to AMTA in English. The
Director of Professional Programs distributes the copies to the
Chair and Subcommittee members of the Committee. After the
documented changes are reviewed by the Chair and Subcommittee,
the same procedures as outlined above will apply.
Step 9. The AMTA Board of Directors considers
the Committees recommendations and will resolve to (1)
approve the program; (2) defer approval until necessary changes
are documented; (3) grant conditional approval pending NASM
accreditation or affirmation for a limited period of time; or (4)
not approve the program. The Executive Director will then notify
the institution of the Boards decision in writing, with an
explanation (if applicable).
V. Consultation Services Available:
Institutions may request consultation services
from either AMTA or NASM for assistance in the future development
of a music therapy program or for assistance in the resolution of
problems by contacting the respective offices of the
associations. Academic institutions requesting an on-site
consultation from AMTA for new program development would be
charged a consultation fee plus expenses for this service.
VI. AMTA Annual Reports from Approved
Academic Programs:
Approved academic programs shall submit annual
reports to AMTA as requested by the Director of Professional
Programs. Such reports as the Enrollment Data Form should be
submitted to AMTA in a timely manner as requested. The purposes
of such reports are to use this statistical data in predicting
trends in the field, provide information to institutions that are
interested in implementing a new music therapy degree program,
and to support educators in justifying the need for additional
faculty as they experience growth in their programs. In addition,
the information also updates the AMTA files on the names of music
therapy program directors, institution addresses, telephone
numbers, fax, and e-mail addresses.
VII. Procedures for Deferring AMTA
Approval upon Review:
If an institutions music therapy
program(s) is not granted AMTA approval following its application
to apply for new program approval or for maintaining its
approval, AMTA may grant a deferral. After the second consecutive
deferral of an application of a music therapy program for failure
to meet a specific standard of AMTA, AMTA may approve an
application with a request for a progress report; place a music
therapy program on probation for a specified period of time; or
withdraw approval of a music therapy program after all procedures
regarding petition for review of adverse decisions have been
followed (see below).
VIII. Procedures Regarding Petition
for Review of Adverse Decisions
When a serious disagreement arises concerning
AMTAs decision on the approval status of an
institutions program(s) or a decision of non-compliance
with AMTA Standards and/or Code of Ethics, the institution may
petition the AMTA Board of Directors to review its decision.
Procedures for the review of adverse decisions are as follows:
Step 1. The institution submits a written
petition to the AMTA Executive Director outlining why the
approval status for its music therapy program(s) should be
reconsidered by AMTA.
Step 2. The AMTA Board of Directors evaluates
the petition and presents its findings to the Academic Program
Approval Committee and/or other appropriate bodies of the
Association.
Step 3. The AMTA Academic Program Approval
Committee and/or other appropriate bodies of the Association
reconsider the music therapy programs application in light
of information presented and the Board of Directorss
evaluation of the petition.
Step 4. The AMTA Academic Program Approval
Committee and/or other appropriate bodies of the Association
submit their recommendations regarding the petition to the AMTA
Board of Directors.
Step 5. The AMTA Board of Directors considers
the recommendations, and the Executive Director then notifies the
academic institution in writing of the Boards final
decision on the AMTA approval status of the institutions
music therapy program(s).
IX. Non-Compliance with AMTA Standards
and/or Code of Ethics:
AMTA may occasionally receive complaints about
an approved music therapy academic program for non-compliance
with the Associations Standards or Code of Ethics. Five
copies of a complaint of non-compliance shall be in writing and
sent via registered mail to the Executive Director of the
Association. An additional copy shall be sent via registered mail
to the Music Therapy Program Director and any other relevant
parties against whom the complaint has been made at the academic
institution. AMTA assumes no responsibility for reviewing
isolated individual grievances. Complaints will be considered
only when the reported conditions are substantially documented
and reflect conditions within a music therapy program(s) that
jeopardize the quality of the education and training program
and/or the general welfare of the program. Complaints will be
referred to the Academic Program Approval Committee and/or any
other appropriate bodies within the Association, such as the
Ethics Board, for evaluation of the complaint. The appropriate
bodies shall investigate, consult with all other appropriate
bodies within the Association (if applicable), and jointly make a
decision regarding the resolution of the alleged violation. A
recommendation shall then go to the Board of Directors for
official action. A copy of this decision shall be sent via
registered mail to all principals by the Executive Director.
Current as of 3/09
| |
|
| |
Return to Top
| |
| |